Art

You are currently browsing the archive for the Art category.

I recently used Facebook to solicit advice from my friends on where I might buy some new art prints for my home.  One friend (thanks, THP) suggested art.com, and I did find a lot of great prints there to choose from.

But the best thing about art.com is that you can learn a lot about art there.  They have their prints categorized by era (pre 12th Century to 20th Century), by movement (Cubism, Art Nouveau, Impressionism, etc.), by nationality, and by subject (animals, scenic, dance, etc.).  And, because within each category there are dozens and dozens of famous works, you can scan through them and get a feel for that movement or century or whatever you’re interested in.  Yes, you’re just seeing a tiny image which could never capture the subtleties of the actual work of art, and this is no substitute for going to museums and seeing the masterpieces for yourself, or even for taking a course or reading a good art history book.  But this is the best overview of the world of painting that I’ve ever experienced.

I skimmed through a few dozen paintings in each movement from the 17th century to the present day.  I now know why Vermeer is considered such a genius, after seeing his work next to many others from his time.  I saw the difference between Impressionism (nice) and Post-Impressionism (horrifying).  I confirmed my suspicion that, although I can appreciate the skills of the Hudson River School, landscapes bore me to tears.  Not surprisingly, most of the modern movements are a total fraud and just plain ugly.  But now I know a bit more about them.  And I found a few new artists that I love – hurray!

I learned more in 3 hours on art.com than I’ve learned in any one place before.  However, if I had no knowledge at all going in, I don’t think I could have learned very much.  I already had some ideas of what I liked and what many of the actual pieces looked like.  Art.com just helped me with categorization and filling in a lot of gaps.  (The multiple ways to filter makes shopping for prints an amazing experience as well.)  If you’re like me and enjoy art, but are a relative novice, it might be worth a few hours of your time.  Let me know if you enjoy it!

Moon Landing

I have nothing to add to Myrhaf’s beautiful words in this poem.

Addiction

I’ve tried to restrain myself from writing too much about my favorite show, So You Think You Can Dance, but I just must post this clip from the show last night.  This is some of the greatest choreography I’ve ever seen.  Mia Michaels is an evil genius.

I really like the interesting design of blogger Michelle Mitchell’s remodel:


Our Home Remodel Is Finished from Michelle Mitchell at Scribbit on Vimeo.

What a great way to expand the existing rooms and bring in tons of natural light.  At first I didn’t like the way the addition looked from the outside, but once I saw the function of it on the inside, I grew to like the view from outside as well.  And aren’t those light fixtures the best? 

I’m also impressed with the way this family uses their space.  The house is not very large, and there are four kids living there!  Michelle also blogs, bakes, and does tons of crafts from that house.  I hope to be so organized some day.

Something the Lord Made is a great movie.  It’s theme is:  The intrinsic value of doing work you love is more fundamental than any reward you can gain from the world for doing it. 

The movie is based on the true story of the two men who pioneered heart surgery.  The partners, one a relatively uneducated black man and the other a respected doctor, are both great men, and the central conflict is one of good versus good – an essential element in any good movie.  (Even the better superhero movies present an internal clash within the hero which ties in to his struggles against evil.)

Without giving away too much, I can say that this movie portrayed independence as the antidote to racism.  Watching it during this historic time when our great nation has elected a black man as President gave the story extra meaning.

Rush is my favorite band of all time.  I named my cat Geddy after the singer, Geddy Lee.  My cat died two years ago at the age of 17, so you have an idea of how long I’ve been a fan.  I met Alex Lifeson and Geddy Lee a long time ago at a music and tennis festival in California.  Of course, Neil Peart did not attend – he rarely gives interviews or does publicity appearances.  That is one reason these videos are so special.  (via: List of the Day)

Rush Failing to Play Rush on Guitar Hero: 

 

Rush Interview and Performance on The Colbert Report:

 

 

Did you see Twitch and Kherington last night?  That dance was so beautiful it brought me to tears.  I’ve now watched it five times and I find it more amazing each time.

 

I don’t consider all dance to be art.  Some dance is entertainment, which can be fun, interesting, powerful, shocking, even beautiful.  Some dance is just movement to a rhythm, which can be pleasurable to the dancer, but is pretty boring to watch even if well done.  But sometimes dance qualifies as art.  If art is “a selective re-creation of reality according to an artist’s metaphysical value judgments,” then to be art, a dance must convey something, through movement, about man or about the world he lives in.  Since dance is performed to music, another art form, one might say it is just an enhancement, but I think dance can bring a whole new meaning to a piece of music.  I haven’t found that there is any type of dance that always qualifies as art.  Depending on the choreography, I’ve seen dance as art in individual performances of all types:  ballet, contemporary, even hip hop.  But it is a rare thing.

 

It was very interesting to see the passionately different reactions of the judges to the waltz last night.  They all loved the choreography and the technique of the dancers, but that didn’t mean they all loved the piece as a work of art.  Mia Michaels found Kherington’s smile to be out of place in the piece, saying that she thought there should be “more reality” in her performance.  The other judges found her expression to be joyful and uplifting.  Mia responded that she could see what they meant, that there was a “beauty and an innocence” in her face, but that, in her opinion, it was “a little glossy.”  Nigel Lythgoe pointed out that the couple “breathed together” and “felt the music together.”  Mary Murphy said she knew what the choreographer was feeling about his theme, parenthood.  The judges found different things to be important, depending on their view of man and of reality.  Nigel and Mary were focused on the grace and beauty and were pleased with the consistency of the performance with the style of the waltz.  Both seemed to recognize something in the relationship of the dancers to each other and to the music.  It touched them – it resonated with their sense of what life is about.   For Mia however, the dance clashed with her view of reality, which she implicitly acknowledged by positing a joyful smile and reality as opposites.

 

The main reason this dance worked as art was its integration.  The theme of both the music and the dance was parenthood.  Some movements were literal, such as Twitch holding and rocking Kherington like a baby, but most conveyed the feelings of parenthood through their graceful flow and the delicate way the dancers touched each other.  The lighting was low and in blue tones, evoking the peace and stillness you might feel watching your baby sleep.  The costumes where simple, loose and white, representing the innocence of the baby.  The two dancers really did feel the music – they got it.  The emotion on both of their faces summed up everything. 

 

I loved this dance so much that I have to buy Celine Dion’s “A New Day Has Come.”  That song will now always have a meaning to me it didn’t before.