November 2009

You are currently browsing the monthly archive for November 2009.

Three Good Things for the day:

  1. I love my new work of fiction writing.  No other work has ever made me bang my desk repeatedly and yell out to the empty room:  “Yes!  F*&@ yes, that’s it!  I got it!” 
  2. Sammy and I went to Adam’s work and visited a while then watched him teach a class.  We stayed for about 15 minutes and then Sammy said she wanted to go home because daddy was TOO LOUD.
  3. The morning DJ one-upped himself today and played Rush’s The Spirit of Radio.  There really is no better song to hear in the car first thing in the morning:

Begin the day with a friendly voice
A companion unobtrusive
Plays that song that’s so elusive
And the magic music makes your morning mood.
Off on your way, hit the open road
There is magic at your fingers
For the spirit ever lingers -
Undemanding contact in your happy solitude

Do you think she’s the musical type?

Three Good Things for the day:

  1. I caught Journey’s “Lovin’ Touchin’ Squeezin’” on the radio in the car, where I could sing it as loud as I wanted and ham it up as much as I wanted, without worrying about offending anybody.
  2. Sammy went through some kind of sudden change overnight.  It’s impossible to describe, but both Adam and I can see that she is speaking more grammatically, expressing new thoughts, and is just generally smarter than she was yesterday.
  3. I got Sammy’s school photo today and it is one of the best pictures of her, ever! 

Sammy has supposedly been potty trained for over 9 weeks now, but we’re still in the state where I’m cleaning poop off of the floor, underwear, pants, coats, shoes, and skin (including my own) every single day.  This is much worse than diapers.

About a week or two after she stared school, she got the hang of using the potty all the time.  That lasted for a week or so, and then she decided that she could poop in her pants.  This was bad enough, but Sammy has always been a frequent pooper, so it often meant 3 accidents per day.  At one point, I had found poop in her underwear when I picked her up from school every day for at least 2 weeks.  We made a big deal about not having accidents at school and she’s been doing better lately, but it just means that the accidents happen at home now.

More recently, she has reduced her poops to once per day, usually.  That is something of a relief, but the whole problem is starting to wear on me.  I haven’t done much about it because everything I’ve read and been told implies that there is nothing that I can do, and I should expect accidents.  But this is insane.  Here are some definitions of “accident:”

  • An unforeseen and unplanned event or circumstance (Nope – I know it’s going to happen every day)
  • Lack of intention or necessity (Nope – I know she can poop in the potty; at some level, she is choosing not to)
  • Used euphemistically to refer to an involuntary act or instance of urination or defecation (This is supposed to be the definition I’m looking for but, nope – it’s not involuntary; I know she can control it if she puts the effort into it)
  • An unfortunate event resulting especially from carelessness or ignorance (OK, this might be an accurate description)

I guess my point is that these are not really accidents.  She has just chosen to stop using the potty.  Last week, in a moment of extreme frustration, I decided to try something.  Since she can not be trusted to use the potty on her own, I am going to have to force her to sit on it at regular intervals every day.  (I’ve never made her “try” to go to the potty.  I found that she would never, ever go when told, but if she did it at the time of her choosing, she’d be fine.  I might ask, “Do you need to use the potty?” before leaving the house, but if she says “No” then I let it go.  This has never caused pee accidents.  I totally trust her with that.  Adam makes her try, but I think he’s wasting his time.)

So now, every morning and a few times each afternoon, I tell her she must sit on the potty for one minute.  I also force her to sit on it if I hear grunting noises.  I know that she will never poop during that minute.  But I’m trying to impose a consequence for her pooping in her pants.  She obviously does not care about being dirty, despite the conventional wisdom that kids don’t like to have accidents or to be dirty.  I’ve explained to her that the reason we are doing this is that I can’t trust her to go on her own.  I’ve already explained to her what it costs me when she poops in her pants.  I wish I could make her clean it up, but obviously she isn’t ready for that.  I’ve explained about germs and wasted time and wasted money (we’ve thrown out so many pairs of underwear that I can’t keep track anymore).  None of that seems to matter to her.  But I know that she hates to be told what to do, so that’s what is going to happen now.  If she doesn’t sit on the potty, I will hold her down.  Luckily, we haven’t had to resort to that yet.

This technique worked with another problem we had a few weeks ago.  Sammy had stopped following me when we were walking together.  It could take a half hour to walk the 20 paces from the playground to the car and get her strapped in.  I’ve never been one to hold her hand and drag her around, but after putting up with these delays for a while, I told her that she had lost the privilege of walking by herself and that we had to hold hands whenever we were walking somewhere.  I told her we would do it for one week, and that’s all it took.  After a week, she got her privilege back and she’s been much better about sticking with me since.  She still needs constant reminders, but she listens.  I’m hoping that forcing the potty issue will work the same way.  I told her we’d start with a week, but that if she was still having accidents, that we’d keep doing it until she had learned to poop in the potty every single time.

So far, we’ve only had minor success.  She’s put a couple of tiny nuggets in the potty, but it is obvious that she is holding it as long as possible and then losing control when she can’t hold it anymore.  But I’m sticking with it until and unless I have a better idea.  Now, I’m off to do more laundry…

Food

I must have been hungry today to think of these Three Good Things for the day:

  1. I had leftover lamb stew for breakfast.  Eggs are so Twentieth Century.
  2. Champps has the best patty melt I’ve ever had.  Wow – go get one tomorrow!  Lunch with Sammy is always fun.
  3. We had crab legs for dinner.  This happens to be both mine and Adam’s favorite food.  It was nice to see Sammy enjoy it with us.

Three Good Things for the weekend:

  1. The musical version of “Go, Dog. Go!”
  2. I wore sandals and a short-sleeved shirt today.
  3. Lamb stew in the crockpot.  (I skipped the mushrooms but added a bag of frozen stew vegetables at the end.)

Sammy just taught me how to make a neat pile of cards.  She has some small, square pieces of cardboard that are part of a board game.  She collected seven of them and spread them out.  Then she placed each one in a neat stack.  She picked up the whole stack and tapped the edge on the table to line up the cards.  She rubbed her finger over the top edge of the stack to make sure the cards were aligned.  Then she said,

THAT’S HOW WE DO IT.  NOW IT’S YOUR TURN. 

I love Montessori!

Three Good Things for the day:

  1. My daughter’s humming and singing as she works.
  2. The Virginia sun in November is strong enough to heat up my car, even when the temperature is in the low 50′s.  Quite a change from the Michigan sun in November.
  3. Highest traffic ever on the blog today.  Thanks, Diana!

Three Good Things for the day:

  1. We had an old friend from Michigan visit for dinner tonight and the minute he walked in the door, Sammy promptly stripped off her clothes and put on her ladybug shoes.  Luckily our friend has two girls of his own, so he gets it.
  2. I took Toby to the dog park and we met up with two Boxers.  Their owner couldn’t get one of them to drop the tennis ball so he could throw it.  He warned me that the dog would bite me if I tried.  I felt like quite the Dog Whisperer when I stood over that beast, made him sit, and then told him to “drop it,” and he gave up the ball. 
  3. It’s November 5 and I don’t need a coat.

Adam came up with the brilliant idea of setting up our miniature refrigerator in the kitchen for Sammy.  She isn’t able to open the door on the big fridge yet, which hampers her ability to get her own snacks.  We had this little fridge just sitting in our storage room and Adam realized that Sammy probably had the strength to open it. 

Sammy's fridge

He set it up, and, voila!  Sammy now gets her own yogurt and cheese whenever she wants it.  In fact, she loves serving yogurt for two.  She’ll get the two containers of yogurt and place them at our respective places at the table, then she will get 2 napkins from the shelf she can reach, and 2 spoons from her low cabinet.  Then she asks, WOULD YOU LIKE HAVE YOGURT WITH ME, MOMMY? 

We plan on putting more food in the fridge for her, but yogurt is her main refrigerated snack.  We do have a small pitcher of milk in there (you can buy the pitcher from For Small Hands for $7.50), but she hasn’t had the guts to try it herself yet.  Once she does, she’ll be able to get her own cereal for breakfast.  And that will bring me one step closer to my selfish goal of having her be totally self-sufficient in the morning.  Interesting how my selfish goals seem to coincide with what is best for her, isn’t it?

Here it is!  NoodleFood hosts the Objectivist Round Up this week.  Food for your noodle, indeed.

Today started out pretty rough.  I’ve been extremely busy lately and I was overwhelmed with the amount of stuff that needed to get done today.  But somehow I got it all done, plus I made a giant leap in my plot development, plus I actually relaxed quite a bit, thanks to these Three Good Things:

  1. A professional massage.
  2. My daughter, asleep on my chest.
  3. Battlestar Galactica with the hubby.

Does the horse have a tail?
YES.
Does Toby have a tail?
YES.
Does Jinx have a tail?
YES.
Do you have a tail?
NO, I HAVE A VAGINA.

Three Good Things for the day, all revolving around our first parent-teacher conference at Sammy’s Montessori school:

  1. The first words out of Sammy’s teacher’s mouth were, “She’s a very independent little girl.”
  2. Sammy is the first in her age-group to start working with the Movable Alphabet, except for one boy who is almost four.  (Of course, she’s probably also the only one who still poops in her pants practically every day but the teacher didn’t mention that.)  It’s such a joy to see how she has carried her interest in reading into school, and that her teacher recognizes that interest.
  3. Sammy’s teacher confirmed what I already knew:  Sammy loves school, and is very happy there.

On Friday, an older post of mine (Children Vows) was published at Mamapedia Voices (welcome, new readers!) and I had a completely new blogging experience:  I got a lot of negative comments.  I’ve been told publicly that I should not be a parent.  Thanks, everyone – I feel like a real mommy blogger now!

I read every single comment after seeing how intriguing the first few were.  The audience at Mamapedia Voices is a general audience of moms (and dads, I’m sure), whereas my regular readers are mostly Objectivists, a lot of them parents.  It was fascinating to see the difference in the responses.  The Mamapedia comment that captured the difference best was from Kala, who said, “Wow…I don’t even know how to respond to this. I’ve never seen anything like it.”  I was surprised to hear that because this particular post didn’t seem like anything too unusual to me.  But then I thought about it:

  • I say that my husband and I are having a child for selfish reasons.
  • I say that our priorities are career, marriage, and then child, in that order.
  • I say that with rational people, there are no conflicts of interest so that what is good for us as parents is generally good for the child.

All of these principles are so integrated into my life (and most of my friends and readers share them) that I don’t think about them as being that far from the norm.  But, of course, they are – especially the idea that selfishness is a virtue.  In my world, it’s easy to forget that most people think selfishness is the biggest vice in the book.

The most interesting comments were those that misunderstood the essence of the post.  First, it seems that many people believe that career means money.  I was chastised for putting money ahead of family.  That’s so funny to me.  The idea that the only value in a career is the money it brings is so foreign to my way of thinking that I never would have thought to clarify it (and I’m not going to clarify it here).  Even more common was the misapprehension that when I said that my husband and I were clueless when we wrote the Children Vows, that I meant we now think they were a mistake and we now renounce them.  And re-reading the post, I can see that the readers did have some basis to think what they did.  Coming from their context of believing selfishness to be a vice and parenting to be the ultimate act of altruism, it would be hard to believe that I was truly advocating selfishness in parenting.  When I said we were clueless, I was a little unclear about exactly in what way, and I don’t think it was a totally unreasonable interpretation for some to think that I was saying that I had no idea that I was going to have to sacrifice.

Of course, I did not mean that at all.  We were clueless about the details.  We still hold the same principles, but now we know that the challenges in holding them are different than what we thought they would be.  Travelling with a small child is easy.  Showering is not.  And, according to my principles, I have worked hard to keep showering.  I will never, ever use the cowardly excuse of sacrifice to give up a value.  I will keep working for all of my values.  That is the point of the Children Vows.

These comments reminded me of how difficult it is to try to communicate to both Objectivists and non-Objectivists at the same time.  I’m not interested in defending or promoting Objectivism, but I do like to write about how I apply Objectivist ideas in everyday life.  It’s hard to strike a balance between setting enough context for a general audience and not boring those who already share the same core beliefs.

And then I realized that this tension is exactly what has been so difficult about coming up with good plot-theme ideas for my fiction writing.  I have no interest in defining an entire philosophy in a novel as Ayn Rand did.  I want to write good stories with what I’d call “medium-depth” themes.  But because my most basic beliefs are so unconventional, it is difficult to get to those themes without going all the way back to the core ideas.

I’m going to be doing a lot more thinking on this issue.

« Older entries § Newer entries »